awb onesky focal length
8 inch dob? That's really just the right material. I think you will need to use an extension tube to get focus on an artificial star. Is that a bad joke? A less expensive option than a Nagler would be a ES82 4.7mm like the one I used to own. What really makes the OneSky small, however, is a collapsing truss tube that reduces the length of the telescope to 388 mm (14.5 in) in a matter of seconds. Edited by PeterAB, 30 December 2019 - 06:35 PM. True! The bushing they used was a little small for the hole. thank you jlandy. 9mm Expanse accomplished the same ⦠The Astronomers Without Borders Onesky Reflector Telescope may be the best option for you. I'm slow at everything. The equivalent in US dollars is currently $294. I just ordered the Onesky Sunday night and can not wait to check it out. Uranus is the brightest thing in the sky in that area now. Please note - due to COVID-19, this scope will be not be available for delivery until late February. How do I decide where to go from here? Thanks for the compliments jacknet! The focal ratio is the ratio of the focal length to the aperture. I went from 1 telescope to 3 over the holiday (I found a bunch of good deals on the classifieds here). It was a beautiful clear night. That's neat! As for the blackening, doing the primary will do absolutely nothing. Good to know! haha nice little review jlandy! A higher-end wide-field eyepiece is the Televue 24mm Panoptic. I used to program AS400's and I'd rather do that than try to figure our dss. 6 inch dob? How to attach ZWO ASI 294MC pro to Celestron C8. Start at the lower right star in Aries and more towards the horizon about 7 degrees (about three full fields with the stock 25m EP). Page 167 of 195 - OneSky Newtonian - Astronomers without borders - posted in Beginners Forum (No astrophotography): A baffle is easily made from the same hobby foam as the shroud is made from. Got the OneSky for Christmas and trying to sort it all out. Jlandy - I borrowed some fits files from a friend so I could start learning the post-processing end of it. The 130mm f/5 reflector is a versatile design capable of fairly wide fields at low power and crisp views at high powers. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. keep them coming!!!! I told you I'm slow. Finally tried out my OneSky tonight. Thanks a heap. The provided 25mm eyepiece gives a true field of view of nearly 2º at 26x, which is very good for viewing many open clusters. I’m over 800 Herschel objects with 6 “ or under scopes, almost all from light polluted Puget Sound skies. I'm now sorting out a new tripod for the refractor and putting a small kit together so my brother can borrow it for his camping trips. Just wanted to say hi. "A baffle is easily made from the same hobby foam as the shroud is made from.". Thank you to all who have contributed. Apologies for this - my first entry - hoping it posts correctly. I like to confirm by taking the target out of focus. If you are a beginner looking to purchase an inexpensive yet great quality telescope, then look no further. The most obvious difference between the StarBlast Fortunately a telescope doesnât need to be complicated to provide remarkable views of the wonders in our skies. Thanks for the input guys. A slightly more conservative high power option is the 5T6. You can do a whole lot with the Arduino (I have 3 of them ), it shouldn't be too much of an ordeal to control stepper motors with one. 4.2 out of 5 stars 78. With the moon out and limited viewing window before clouds rolled back in, I took some time to check out the Tycho crater, the Orion nebula, the Pleiades, and the Double Cluster. The refractor fit the bill, and it was cheap enough that I don't have to worry a lot about jostling it in the car. Let us know. I already have an arduino for the motor controller and a woodshop to put it all together. It even comes with a remote control and smartphone adapter to take pictures, so you can capture your little stargazerâs first astronomer experience. Lined up the little red dot neck abuser, already planning a mount for a Rigel Quickfinder...my go to aimer of choice. In the link is a picture of a light baffle (they call it a light shield), for a much bigger scope. I'll try the black thread tomorrow. For a dob base the size of the Onesky, they can be marked in 1 degree or smaller increments. Use a bubble level to make sure the scope is perfectly level. That’s what makes a horse race, difference of opinion! Amateur Astronomy makes news in uk (telescope sales gone up 50% since lockdown), Help needed on the wiring of the MyFocuserPro2 project. DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging, Community Forum Software by IP.BoardLicensed to: Cloudy Nights, This is not recommended for shared computers, Back to Beginners Forum (No astrophotography). I just know for a guiding eyepiece you want the threads really thin so you can still see the star you're guiding on. Design And Mechanics Of The Onesky 130. J. I think the most important thing to note though was the OneSky was by far the fastest to set up and start observing. If I remember right, this site started me in the right direction. Thank you for your generosity. Despite this, the scope is quite compact, partially because the paraboloidal mirror, at f/5, has a focal length of only 650 mm (25.6 in). The baffle is actually shiny, and small. Jim - I received today. FYI: Scopestuff sells 12" x 48" pieces, enough to build two One Sky shrouds. The barlow with your 6mm will pretty much max out the scope. Probably other factors also. I know this doesn't help much, but I'd check those sites out first. The view will just look cleaner. We have people in other countries wanting to buy it because of that. Hi tg.,The full moon will accually show you less craters because they are visible due to the shadows.,when luna is full it's also very bright.,lol..you will see what I mean.. You may want to try sitting while observing.,It's more comfy and for me.,I'm much steadier over the eyepiece sitting.,When I first got my OS I set it on a milkcrate and I sat on another.,this worked ok.,but there are better solutions.,Some have found end tables that worked.,others like myself made something.,my legs are attached.,not folding or removeable(easily anyway).. For the "light funnel" I'm guessing you mean the shroud.,I used thin foam from Walmart.,$.88 a sheet.,It takes 2.,buy 3.,lol.,good luck.,read through this thread for other ideas.,cheers,. AWB OneSky Reflector Telescope (US delivery only) The OneSky is currently on back order. Further, if you baffle the tube well, darkening the secondary won’t help either. ... awb onesky celestron inspire 100az Telescope weight: 14 pounds. AWB Onesky Reflector Telescope Review. Specifically, what would be the drawback (other than $$$) to having the higher magnification wide angle EP? OPEN BOX CELESTRON 11" EDGE HD OTA - UT-13748 ITEM #UT-13748 This is an open box item in LIKE NEW condition Aperture: 11" Focal Ratio: f/10 Focal Length: 28⦠I used the Celestron zoom lens for each telescope to try to get a fair comparison. A problem I'm facing is that I would love some sort of tripod so that I can stand up straight. Is there any such thing that just works for this scope without my having to mod anything? Because we are going for ease of use, I have the Celestron 8-24mm zoom and my old Barlow but I am looking at getting a 32mm (still undecided on how much I will invest in it) just for my own enjoyment. How to properly stretch extremely faint objects. A bit of chapstick helped the focuser. Just stumbled onto this forum topic. The refractor has noticeable (not terrible) chromatic aberration, and the astrograph has some definitive coma action going on I'll have to correct to take pictures. I sold all of my T6's but kept the 13. Some have someone in the US order and send it on or pick it up when they're here. Just out of curiosity does the focuser have enough travel when a Barlow is used? Hello and welcome to CN.,and to the Onesky world.. As for locating things it takes practice and a little knowledge of the sky.,Using an app or a planisphere get out and try to identify some of the brighter stars.,and expand from them.,I can't speak about the eyepieces because I have not used them.,but 66*afov is a good start., There are lots of things you can do to the OS to help find stuff.,degree circles for one.,you can get them online and have them printed up.,good luck.,go slow.,enjoy the view.,The Onesky is a great scope.,cheers. You want to put something there to block that light. Thanks for figuring out the details! Thanks:". It would be a shame to be unable to take advantage of the higher magnifications. The first step is to have a phone/tablet/laptop app like stellarium or Sky safari that can tell you real time alt/azimuth coordinates based on your exact location and time. The OneSky is just a really good deal (for now). Update: Kydex SHROUD material claimed and no longer available. Christmas upgraded my 80mm refractor to the Heritage 130p (Canada). He camps alone so I suspect he will really enjoy having a project on those dark clear nights. Both are small Newtonian reflectors, though the OneSkyâs 130-mm f/5 mirror gathers 30% more light and has a 44% longer focal length than the StarBlastâs 114-mm f/4 mirror. Surprisingly, the size of the "sweet spot" depends only on the main mirror's focal ratio (the mirror's focal length divided by its diameter) and not its size. Now I can search with one while others enjoy the view from the second, and I don't have to worry about a little kid trying to swing from the OneSky's focuser. The stock 25mm eyepiece is nicer than I thought and wide enough. You currently have javascript disabled. Going the other way will cause the star to turn into a center dot with a dark circle around it and a bunch of rings around that (this is the way collimation is checked and tuned-if the rings are centered, then collimation is correct. so - recent developments! I will say that stacking RAWs instead of tiffs works much better, and I think faster, As far as tutorials go, it is mostly from trying new things in Photoshop, and making small adjustments. Do you know of any easy to follow instructionstutorials for this stuff? Been using it straddle style sitting on a raised cushion with it between my legs, but have some c-spine issues and found looking into a low lying typical red dot finder a PITN. Uranus is naked eye visible from a reasonable dark site. An old-time astronomer I knew who worked in the '40s and '50s made his own guiding eyepieces using the thinnest thread known at the time -- black widow silk. ES68 24mm - excellent widefield option. But the idea is the same. I've been using an SVBONY 9mm Ultra Wide Angle eyepiece with an SVBONY 2x Barlow (thus an effective 4.5mm) in my AWB OneSky 130mm f/5 for all my planetary viewing needs. The nebula filter will make things like orion nebula, dumbell nebula and the ring nebula really pop. The provided eyepieces seem to be pretty good quality wrapped in very inexpensive housings, the eye relief is very good. I only recently started experimenting with flats, never use darks, and haven't seen any benefit from bias frames. My biggest issue at the moment is I will find something in the sky (IE Neptune) using an app on my phone but I cant quite see it in the sky in order to pin point it with the scope. You will have to let us know how the EP's do compared to the ones that came with the scope. I would add a barlow and a UHC nebula filter to the wish list. F/8 is easier on cheaper eyepieces, and they won't produce astigmatism at the edges of the field as easily. but I am curious what was your rational for the 120mm refractor? Now that was fun...time to get back to work on the Astroscans...anybody have Astroscan pieces you can unload them on me. PS.,Neptune is a tough target because it looks stellular.,you have to know right where to look.. Edited by clearwaterdave, 30 December 2019 - 02:33 PM. The challenge of it is fun for me though. I caught him devouring chapters of "Turn Left at Orion" over the holidays and with his physics background, he may get hooked pretty easily. Also the same question regarding the light funnel I see on people scopes. It is the exact same telescope other than the branding. HR Planetary clones Tube length collapsed: 14.5 inches. It moves around just a little bit around true cosmic north. I did have to take my base apart and fix some slop on the azimuth rotation. The sample photos I got are in fits file format which is probably the hardest to work with. ES82 6.7mm or Meade 5.5mm 82o - either will be hard to beat for high power option. Recently I've been trying the LLRGB method documented in the astronomersdoitinthedark website. If using Polaris, note that polaris is not at exact north. Brand new to all of this and to these forums. There may be more cost importing it to Australia than the US though I kind of doubt it. The OneSky is a widefield instrument, and a capable one. Product Reviews / By Gordon Watts. Edited by tgwaste, 30 December 2019 - 01:45 PM. They were at the very edges of the fov, but they were there. My collection now includes the OneSky, an Orion 120mm f/8.3 refractor, and an Orion 200mm f/4 astrograph. You certainly want a shroud for the open truss, then a tube shield extension, and finally a light block for just below the focuser. Page 188 of 195 - OneSky Newtonian - Astronomers without borders - posted in Beginners Forum (No astrophotography): I took my onesky out last night to check on Jupiter/Saturn conjunction. - I have to admit that I really want to do what you are doing but the biggest thing that's inhibiting me from being able to do pictures like you are doing is Money. There are a few things to consider: So it may not be that far out of whack. If it is a star, going out of focus one way will show the secondary mirror shadow. Their dollar is only $0.70 US. One thing I would do differently if I make a new shroud is to route it in front of the existing black plastic baffle, rather than behind it. I've had it out a couple of times (the only non-cloudy nights so far) and in our Ottawa light pollution, I was quite impressed! New? I tried a green laser to find objects with the refractor, but the cold knocked it out instantly. also good to hear that we are not loosing you here! Has anybody used the Omegon Push+ scopes ? Tonight was the first night in a while without rain/snow, I got ~an hour or so of observing in all of the telescopes. After checking the telescope, it would appear my secondary mirror is already in alignment, but it's nice to know i didnt have to spend anything to find that out! Has anybody used the Omegon Push+ scopes ? The OneSkyâs collapsible tube packs 5â³ of aperture into a 16â³ long package and the helical focuser has a very low profile. The plastic baffle is black but not very matte, and it reflects somewhat. There was a lot of trial and error in my learning process, with the experience I have now I could probably do the same thing for a lot less money. Can’t wait to star test the mirror but so far I’m in awe of what a couple hundred bucks can buy. I feel like I have pretty much maxed out what I can do with this scope (this is my progress over the past year) and want to upgrade. I was able to get both planets in the same view with my ES 14mm/82° ep. And on, and on, and on... Been to star parties, have talked with a lot of people, but still haven't pulled the trigger. Sorry for not posting an update for those inquiring. I'm trying though. I have all the mating pieces to hook it up to the scope but as most of us have found out. When I add up the retail costs of all the extras you have well it scares the heck out of my wallet. I thought I would have to drill a few holes in the eyepiece, but it turns out there are slots on the bottom to begin with. It would increase my understanding exponentially. If you want to invest more than the scope cost then the Baader is a good one; if you want to go cheap the Celestron is fine. For example if the 114mm telescope has a focal length of 910mm, then to achieve 160x you would need to use a 5.69mm eyepiece (910/160). Craigslist? Either of the 6" scopes I mentioned are F/8, vs the AWB OneSky's F/5 focal ratio. But I'm not ready to commit right now. easy to get into but hard to master . The lens diameter is simply the width measurement of the front-most lens in the telescope. ... Meade LightBridge Mini 130, AWB ⦠:-), It's probably fair to say that my post processing would make the experts heads spin. It won't be long Mr. Landy and I'll be bringing in the solar system like you. Focal length is the distance from the telescope lens to the image sensor, like an eyepiece or film. Even so, the Barlow combination compares favourably. Abhat, I use the 8-24mm zoom and a barlow with no issues with focuser travel or weight. Find a length where it still works. The red dot finder is still my preferred method, it's really easy to point where you want to go and just start looking. By the way, the "lower right" star (γ Arietis) is a double that is fun to split. past two years picked up a 10"Orion dob.,a120mm Orion refractor.,and an AT102 ED frac.,but I will still bet in 2020 the OS will again be my most used scope.,For me.,with my set up's..it is just too easy to grab the OS and be out the door and viewing.,and it puts up views comparable to all but the bigger dobs.,Light weight.,easy to use.,and great views.,gonna be hard to beat for me., This is not recommended for shared computers, Back to Beginners Forum (No astrophotography).
7x4 Shed Plastic, Mature Mango Tree, Picture Bald Head, New Minglewood Blues Original, Mcculloch Chainsaw 3516 Oil Tank,